Independent auditor’s report

To the participants of Vesteda Residential Fund FGR

Report on the financial overviews

Our Opinion

We have audited the financial overviews 2016 of Vesteda Residential Fund FGR, based in Amsterdam.

In our opinion the financial overviews are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the accounting policies selected and disclosed by the fund (INREV valuation principles).

The financial overviews comprise:

  1. The consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2016.

  2. The consolidated statement of comprehensive income account for 2016.

  3. The notes comprising a summary of the accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Basis for our opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with Dutch law, including the Dutch Standards on Auditing. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the “Our responsibilities for the audit of the financial overviews” section of our report.

We are independent of Vesteda Residential Fund FGR in accordance with the Verordening inzake de onafhankelijkheid van accountants bij assurance-opdrachten (ViO) and other relevant independence regulations in the Netherlands. Furthermore we have complied with the Verordening gedrags- en beroepsregels accountants (VGBA).

We believe the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Description of responsibilities for the financial overviews

Responsibilities of management for the financial overviews

Management is responsible for the preparation of the financial overviews in accordance with the accounting policies selected and disclosed by the fund (INREV valuation principles).
Furthermore, management is responsible for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial overviews that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Our responsibilities for the audit of the financial overviews

Our objective is to plan and perform the audit assignment in a manner that allows us to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence for our opinion.

Our audit has been performed with a high, but not absolute, level of assurance, which means we may not have detected all material errors and fraud.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial overviews. The materiality affects the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and the evaluation of the effect of identified misstatements on our opinion.

We have exercised professional judgment and have maintained professional skepticism throughout the audit, in accordance with Dutch Standards on Auditing, ethical requirements and independence requirements. Our audit included e.g.:

  • Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement of the financial overviews, whether due to fraud or error, designing and performing audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtaining audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.

  • Obtaining an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control.

  • Evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management.

  • Evaluating the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial overviews, including the disclosures.

Amsterdam, March 17, 2017

Deloitte Accountants B.V.

J. Holland